Comparative analysis on selection, evaluation and promotion of judges: current criteria and methodology used in EU and beyond (draft)

The comparative research confirms the existence of a multitude of approaches related to selection, evaluation and promotion of judges in EU countries and abroad. The differences and concrete models depend on the legal culture, tradition of each country and they need for reforms. No framework is developed until now which would allow the easy comparison of various approaches and singling out of the most promising good practices.


Leave a Reply